| |
Supplement Regulation: Who's Behind
It, and Why Should You Oppose It?
by Brian W. Vaszily
Let's make sure that all vitamin and herbal supplements are clinically
proven
to do what they claim, and that they're safe, before they reach
the consumer.
Let's ensure that their ingredients are closely monitored, and
that their labels
and advertisements tell the truth and nothing but, so that their
consumption
can be based on informed and confident decisions.
What pretty ideals. Pretty enough, in fact, for a host of politicians
and
governments, and the pharmaceutical corporations that control
them, to hide
a considerably more ugly agenda behind.
Right now a war is being fought over the regulation of supplements,
with the
various battles at different stages in countries across the
globe. The European
Union already passed its Food Supplements Directive in July
of 2002, framing
it on the principle that supplements should be proven safe and
effective in the
same manner as pharmaceuticals. The UK did not immediately implement
this directive, but will do so come the end of this month. Australia,
Canada,
New Zealand and a host of other nations are involved in their
own battles, and
here in the U.S. Senator Dick Durbin's proposed "Dietary Supplement
Safety
Act of 2003," one of the first shots in what will undoubtedly
become a
mounting campaign.
In general, the claim behind these bills and directives supporting
tighter (and
tighter and tighter) restrictions on supplements is that they
will make the
world a safer place for us, the consumers. Yeah, and so would
military
occupation of our towns and cities. In reality, it will have
a polar effect on our
health and safety. And it will be chilling.
Keeping You on the Motherland
On a routine basis, Cubans attempt to escape their homeland on
boats bound
for U.S. shores. The ocean waters are certainly not safe, and
there are rarely
any guarantees waiting for them here. Nonetheless, the potential,
the
possibilities, are a far better option than the dangerously
flawed regime they
are trying to leave behind.
This is an apt metaphor in this situation. Because if one thing
is certain it is
this: the conventional healthcare system, our 'Cuba', is seriously
diseased. It
is dominated by industries who are motivated by profit and who
therefore
foster whatever will most increase their profits, your health
be damned. For
example, processed food is far cheaper to produce, deliver and
store than
much healthier whole foods, and so its processed foods that
are dumped en
masse into our supermarkets, restaurants and brains.
And prescription drugs
that merely treat symptoms versus prevent or cure the underlying
causes are a
whole lot more profitable because, well, when they keep you
coming back for
more and more treatment, they've made a customer for life.
Most people, meanwhile, have been brainwashed by this conventional
healthcare regime. They don't even realize their daily habits
like eating are the
primary part of their healthcare, and so it's quite easy for
their habits and
assumptions to be manipulated by the regime. Only when they
get sick or
overweight does their perception of healthcare, fostered by
the
pharmaceutical companies and others on that side of the regime,
kick in: they
will go to the doctor to get a prescription to "save" them.
And these days, in
almost 70% of all patient visits, physicians do indeed give
them the drugs they
crave. But if that doesn't work, if things get serious or seriously
inconvenient,
they move on to surgery.
Of course, most prescription drugs and surgeries, reflecting
conventional
healthcare as a whole, have nothing to do with prevention and
addressing the
causes of illness -- they're all about merely treating symptoms
so people can
move on with their unhealthy lifestyles and get more symptoms
that need
treating. It's great for repeat business.
Some people, however, are aware of the deadly downward spiral
of the
conventional healthcare system. They are refugees from an oppressive
system, to be blunt about it, seeking better alternatives to
prevent and cure
illness, and live longer. And here is the key point of the matter
that's caused
this recent surge in opposition to supplements: their numbers
are increasing
dramatically, and they are finding those better alternatives.
Between 1997 and 2001, there was a 15% increase in sales of vitamin/mineral
supplements. In 2002, the overall market for the alternatives
to prescription
drugs, processed and fast food, and surgery -- that is, natural/organic
foods,
dietary supplements and other natural products -- was $37 billion.
Those numbers, that attempt to escape from conventional healthcare's
stranglehold, is what is behind the recent worldwide war being
waged on the
leader among alternatives, supplements, at over $17 billion
annually. And it's
those dictators at the top of conventional medicine, such as
the
pharmaceutical companies and the governments they own, driving
this war.
You see, all these alternates like supplements are actually
getting people to
believe they can prevent illness and avoid trips to doctors'
offices, and it's
starting to make a dent in their mega-profits, and threatens
to make a much
bigger dent.
They want to blockade your passage to potentially better shores
and force you
to stay in their Cuba. They'll put it in pretty terms of course,
try to package it
as something else like "safety," but that's what they're trying
to do, and
already in Europe, apparently succeeding in doing.
Let the Deadly Dictators Do the
Dictating?
Thomas Moore, a senior fellow in health policy at the George
Washington
University Medical Center, estimates that prescription drugs
-- those reviewed
and approved by the FDA -- contribute to 100,000 U.S. deaths
each year. One
prominent reason for this that I'll visit in an upcoming article
is that the entire
research and approval process for new drugs is a hoax -- in
short, drug makers
now pay private for-profit companies to do the clinical studies
establishing
safety, and the drug companies have a major say in what is and
is not
reported. Meanwhile, who knows how many deaths they indirectly
contribute
to by veering people toward an over-dependency on their quick
"fixes" and
away from a preventative and curative approach to health?
On another front, the overweight/obesity epidemic, fed by other
giants
profiting heartily on their thrones in the healthcare motherland,
is now
directly linked to 300,000 deaths per year.
Sure, everybody's "gotta' go sometime," but the numbers above
-- only a very
partial list, mind you -- are far too many going far too soon
because they are
trapped in the conventional health paradigm. Meanwhile, even
Senator Dick
Durbin, in his 03/26/03 press release promoting his Dietary
Supplement
Safety Act, states that "scientific reports have linked ephedra
and similar
dietary supplements to 117 deaths and more than 17,000 other
health related
problems."
You do the math. In fact, go ahead and play devil's advocate
by assuming that
the number of deaths resulting from conventional health are
overblown --
perhaps it's only a couple hundred thousand yearly total --
while those from
supplements are too conservative -- perhaps it's actually several
hundred
yearly total. And then do the maths. Where does the real problem
that needs
addressing reside?
It is precisely those at the heart of this problem that want
to "regulate"
supplements. Pardon me for stepping out of the party line, but
why would I
possibly trust them to make the supplement industry "safe and
effective"
when I see the monster they've created with conventional healthcare?
Why
would you?
So What Should You Be Swallowing?
None of this is to say, "So trust everything the supplement makers
tell you and
consume, consume, consume!" There are a lot of exaggerated claims,
inconsistent ingredients between supposedly like products, and
other
confusion surrounding supplements. I'm sure you wish you could
walk into
any old store, or log onto any Web site, and know for certain
that when an
herbal claimed it could help prevent disease, restore youth,
and repel rude
people, those claims would be backed by solid clinical evidence.
But you can't.
For that matter, I'm sure you wish you could trust the big businesses
and
governments to fairly and honestly test vitamins and herbals
so we could
make more informed and confident decisions in this respect.
But then you
learn things like this: a major study undertaken to discredit
the herbal St.
John's wart in 2001 received "unrestricted funding" from the
pharmaceutical
company Pfizer. St. John's wort, an anti-depressant, has sales
of over $400
million per year, cutting a niche into the profit of Pfizer's
prescription
anti-depressant Zoloft, and Pfizer doesn't like to lose profit.
It's not the first or
last time a supplement was discredited in an "independent" study
that received
major pharmaceutical company dollars. Of course, such knowledge
(and
there's a lot more of it to be had) entirely shoots down any
trust in the
conventional healthcare establishment.
And so all that's left is reality. And reality is, you must trust
your judgment
more than any other person or institution when it comes to your
health. That
means doing whatever you feel is necessary to trust a supplement
enough to
try it -- researching its claims and source, or finding a source
you trust to
recommend the proper supplements to you.
To conclude, there are two choices today: the main choice, the
conventional
healthcare paradigm, and the alternatives, which include supplements.
The
main choice, being rather deadly, is really no choice at all.
Meanwhile, some of
these alternatives are indeed pure nonsense, others are questionable,
and
some have already been proven as sound and worthwhile. But the
point is, we
all have the capacity, and at least some of us still have the
legal ability, to
choose from among these alternatives.
The bills and directives across the world to "regulate" supplements
are being
pushed by the same powers-that-be that turned conventional healthcare
into
a sick joke for their own greedy ends. With "regulation," they
would be the
ones controlling the alternatives... and so go the alternatives.
Or to put it back into the Cuban metaphor, it's as if Fidel Castro
himself
announced to all those trying to escape his oppressive regime
that he will now
be running a refugee ferryboat service to the shores of Florida.
All aboard?
Me, I'll take my chances swimming.
source: www.mercola.com |
|