| Why
Does The MMR Vaccine Need To Be Suspended? source
The JABS group calls on the Government
to suspend the current MMR vaccination programme in favour of the administration
of three separate
vaccines for Measles, Mumps and Rubella
to be offered at a time interval and age that is appropriate.
To date (September 1998) in excess of 900
families have contacted the JABS group (1,800 to Dawbarns Solicitors) to
report serious health problems
following the MMR vaccination. JABS families
come from all walks of life including the medical profession. We have doctors,
nurses, health visitors etc
who have reported severe problems in their
own children. Problems include: encephalitis, epilepsy, acquired autism,
loss of speech and communication,
arthritis, diabetes, profound deafness,
Guillain-Barre syndrome - a paralysis condition. Families quote time periods,
symptoms and long term problems that
in the main are listed in the vaccine
manufacturers' own leaflets.
JABS has not been able to find any properly
conducted trials where the safety of the vaccines has been monitored for
more than a few weeks. JABS has not
been able to find any studies of the long-term
consequences of the use of the MMR vaccines. Indeed the prestigious Institute
of Medicine in the USA has this
to say about vaccine safety:
"In the course of its review, the committee
encountered many gaps and limitations in knowledge bearing directly and
indirectly on the safety of
vaccines. These include inadequate understanding
of the biologic mechanisms underlying adverse events following natural
infection or
immunisation, insufficient or inconsistent
information from case reports and case series, inadequate size or length
of follow-up of many
population-based epidemiologic studies,
and limited capacity of existing surveillance systems of vaccine injury
to provide persuasive evidence of
causation. The committee found few experimental
studies published in relation to the number of epidemiological studies
published. Clearly, if
research capacity and accomplishment in
these area are not improved, future reviews of vaccine safety will be similarly
handicapped."
The DoH is well aware of the problems because
some of our children have been awarded the government's vaccine damage
payment. Payments have been
made for various adverse effects, including:
epilepsy, Guillain Barre syndrome, SSPE (a brain wasting condition), profound
deafness and death.
The information supplied by parents to
JABS keeps being referred to as anecdotal. It must be remembered that scientific
evidence always has its roots in
anecdotal events. We presented the Public
Health Minister, the Chief Medical Officer and other senior advisors with
a list of our 'anecdotal' evidence, in
October last year, pointing out that each
entry represented a real child not just a statistic on a piece of paper.
We requested that the anecdotal evidence
should be investigated urgently.
The current method of reporting adverse
reactions is totally ineffective. If a child reacts to a vaccine the doctor/consultant
caring for the child should report
the problem using the 'yellow card' system.
The card is supposed to be forwarded to the Medicines Control Agency to
be investigated. This has been
recognised by the Public Health Laboratory's
Service as far back as 1995 (Lancet 4 Mar. 95: Vol. 345: 567/569). "There
is an urgent need to find more
reliable methods of adverse event surveillance".
The system continues to fail our children - reactions are very rarely reported!
If the benefits of vaccines are proven
clearly to outweigh the disadvantages, there can be no objection to vaccination
campaigns being carried out provided
that the victims of vaccinations are properly
cared for (which they are most certainly not). JABS is concerned that the
Department of Health and/or the
Medicines Control Agency is not prepared
to listen to the genuine concerns of those who have experienced directly
the problems of vaccine safety.
JABS believes there is evidence that the
MMR vaccine is linked to late onset autism because:
Children who develop
this condition were progressing normally before they were vaccinated, had
passed all milestones and had acquired skills
appropriate to their
age.
They did not simply
fail to progress; they actually regressed, losing skills which they had
already attained. In many instances this is borne out by
videos taken of the
children before and after they were vaccinated.
They showed other physical
changes at the time that they became autistic (such as sleep patterns,
appetite changes, temperature control etc. in addition
to many of them suffering
bowel problems).
The development of autism
is closely linked in time to the administration of the vaccine. The onset
of this condition generally started within about a
month of vaccination
whenever the vaccination took place. In other words, it would be later
for children vaccinated at 15 months than those vaccinated
at 12 months. On top
of that, a substantial proportion of the children had an immediate reaction
to the vaccination, and the change which came over
them dates directly
from that reaction.
Doctor Jeremy Metters, Deputy Chief Medical
Officer, answered a question on the possible link between MMR vaccination
and autism on GMTV recently.
He stated that MMR vaccines have been
given to one hundred and fifty million children in the United States alone,
over 26 years, and this link has not
emerged there at all.
If that is the case, why have the two American
parent research organisations Autism Research Institute and Cure Autism
Now Foundation (CAN) joined
with the National Vaccine Information
Centre (NVIC) in calling for independent studies conducted by non-governmental
researchers into the possible link
between vaccines and autism? The NVIC
is also calling on federal health agencies to publish details of the prospective
case controlled clinical trials and
other safety data used to licence the
live MMR vaccine and recommended second dose of measles vaccine for all
children. Besides, US researchers have
pointed to links between the vaccine and
autism (eg Gupter, Fudenberg and Warren).
Many families have contacted JABS to complain
that the Department of Health (DoH) are denying parents the right to decide
how they vaccinate their
children. One of the MMR vaccine manufacturers',
Pasteur Merieux, has stated that it produces a limited supply of single
measles vaccines as the rest of its
measles stock goes into the MMR jabs.
Representatives have stated that all they need is a directive from the
DoH and the company can supply more single
component vaccines. The DoH has indicated
that it has no intention of changing policy as there is no scientific evidence
to warrant a change in policy, even
if that is what parents want!
In Japan the MMR vaccine was withdrawn
in 1993 because their surveillance system showed an unacceptably high level
of side effects and their policy
makers reverted back to single dose vaccines.
They didn't just buy in alternate MMR vaccine supplies.
It is not satisfactory for the DoH to say
that there is "no evidence" of the link between MMR vaccines and injuries
which these children now suffer. These
facts are indisputable:
i.The children have been vaccinated.
ii.They were not disabled or suffering
from chronic illness before-hand.
iii.All their illnesses developed
soon after vaccination.
It is for the DoH and the manufacturers
to prove that the vaccines are safe not the other way round. This clearly
has not been done. Safety trials were grossly
inadequate - and Government doesn't even
have a central register of autistic children, so that it does not even
know whether autism is on the increase.
Care and consideration must be brought
back into vaccination policy. Children should not be treated as a unit
on a production flow line. Each should be
treated as an individual and the family
and child's health history taken into account before vaccinating.
In the interest of safety for British children
JABS calls for an immediate suspension of the MMR programme whilst urgent
research is undertaken. In the
meantime children should be offered protection
against the diseases by providing measles, mumps and rubella as single
vaccines, with an adequate time
interval and at an age that is appropriate
to the child. |